Buying guide
REKON and Strike: comparing proposals
Public-offering comparison reviewed September 18, 2026. Delivery model, evidence and procurement questions without fabricated rankings.
Scope of this comparison
Editorial review by REKON, September 18, 2026. We compare public statements, not independently tested effectiveness. REKON has a commercial interest. Missing public information does not establish a service’s quality, price or coverage.
Offering and delivery model
Strike presents a continuous hybrid validation platform using AI and human specialists. It describes asset discovery, validation, remediation support and automated retesting. Calling it a simple scanner would be inaccurate. REKON offers human-led pentesting with agreed scope, supporting tools and reproducible Web/API evidence. The actual proposal defines assets, testing window and deliverables.
Procurement and terms
Strike’s homepage offers a demo and platform trial. REKON starts with a scoping request. For either provider, confirm who tests, how much human work applies to your scope, what retesting covers and what changes at contract end. Comparable pricing for identical scope: unconfirmed in this review. SLA for your project: unconfirmed.
What evidence to request
Ask for a sample report and a worked tenant-authorization example. Compare included tests, limitations, remediation and retesting. If you need continuous asset monitoring, explicitly evaluate that model; if you need to assess a release, request a proposal for that version. Neither model eliminates residual risk.
Sources and next step
Strike offering source: official homepage, accessed September 18, 2026; claims were not validated through a paid engagement. REKON public evidence: Web/API scope and synthetic report. Use the comparison worksheet before requesting a proposal.
Straight answers
How do I request a proposal?
- Share the application type, roles and objective through the contact form. Do not send credentials or customer data.
Does a pentest guarantee security?
- No. It evaluates an agreed scope and version within a testing window. Limitations and residual risk remain.
What is agreed before testing?
- Assets, permissions, environments, exclusions, communication, deliverables and retest terms.
Time to test your doors?
Tell us what needs validating. We answer with proposed scope, not a brochure.